Reflections...

Meditations, Reflections, Bible Studies, and Sermons from Kowloon Union Church  

Christianity and Human Rights

This sermon was preached at Kowloon Union Church by James D. Seymour on Sunday, November 18, 2007. The readings heard were from, Isaiah 9:6-7, 10:1-2, I Corinthians 13:8-13, and Ephesians 6:12-15.


As you know, fifty-eight years ago, the United Nations adopted an instrument entitled the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, whose thirty articles set forth standards for humanity in the areas of civil liberties, and economic, social and cultural rights. Although it is not a religious statement, a religious person will inevitably interpret human rights in the light of his or her religion. What I ask of you today is to explore with me the relationship between the human rights about which the Declaration speaks, and our faith.

No claim can be made that the Declaration is a purely Christian document. It was, after all, the product of people of many faiths. One of the authors, 張彭春 P. C. Chang, was a Confucianist. Confucianism, of course, carries a mixed message regarding the nature of human beings, depending on which interpreter you read. Mencius 孟子argued that people are born good, but over time tend to be corrupted by their cultural environment (人本善 習相遠 ). This implies, to me at least, that the people can be trusted, so they should given lots of rights. The corrosive influence of their cultural environment is to be guarded against, not by repressing the people, but by improving the cultural environment. This is a somewhat different approach from, say, what we heard in the service in September, from the book of Romans, about how “to be controlled by human nature results in death; to be controlled by the Spirit results in life and peace” (Romans 8:6). But I wonder if these two philosophies are really all that different. It seems to me that both approaches end up in somewhat the same place; whatever our predispositions at birth, we are now free to be, and do, good--or not. Part of “doing good” is upholding human rights, both in the sense of ourselves not being in any way responsible for violating the human rights of others, and not being passive in the face of any human rights violations of which we are aware.

Still, Christianity, too, sometimes seems to send mixed message on the subject of human rights. There are Biblical passages which call for the subordination of women (Ephesians 5:21), indicate opposition to homosexuality (Leviticus 18:22), oppose the lending of money for interest (Luke 6:34, Romans 13:8) and even seem to condone slavery. But we take all these, which anyway were not concerns of Jesus, as statements of what was socially acceptable in the first millennium before Christ, but not as values divinely mandated for us to hold today.

What then, is the Bible’s positive message on human rights.

Let’s begin with the Old Testament. Earlier in the service you heard a reading from the book of Isaiah (10:1-3), condemning unjust laws and the deprivation of the rights of the poor. And I would also call our attention to Hebrews: Where it is deemed praiseworthy to stand up for those who have been “publicly exposed to insult and persecution,” and to sympathize with those in prison (Hebrews 10: 32-34).

As for the Ten Commandments in Exodus, at first glance these thou-shalt-nots do not seem anything like a list of rights, but merely a list of wrongs. But if you think about it, many of them can be “translated” into positive, rights affirming principles. “Thou shall not kill” means that everyone has a right to life. “Thou shall not steal” is an affirmation of property rights. “Thou shall not give false testimony against thy neighbor” means that everyone has a right not to be defamed. And so on. Thus stated, the Ten Commandments almost come across as precursors of modern human rights.

But our faith is based mainly the New Testament, and the teachings of Christ, sometimes as interpreted by his disciples. Thus, Paul said: “For freedom Christ has set us free. Stand firm, therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery. For you were called to freedom, brothers and sisters; … The whole law is summed up in a single commandment: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ … The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control” (Galatians 5:1, 13-25).

That list of Paul’s is rather long. What social values, in our faith, are central? Well, as you heard in the reading from Corinthians, Jesus himself had his own short list: “And now these three remain: faith, hope and ….” Now, the next word, in the translation we use, is “Love.” But in the old King James version (1611) the word that appeared was “charity.” That’s because the Latin word was caritas. This is the same concept about which you will shortly be singing: “Ubi caritas et amor…deus ibi est.” (Where there is charity and love, God is there.) Actually, in ancient times caritas covered both love and charity. At some point, the two concepts drifted apart a bit, but we do well to remember that originally it was all the one unified concept. It is not sufficient just to love, we must also do right by people. When we hear the verse “And now these three remain: faith, hope and love, but the greatest of these is love,” we must understand that love includes charity.

The minimum requirement of such love, is to behave peacefully toward other humans. Peace, of course, represents the common aspiration of decent people everywhere. In 1984 the United Nations, in adopting the Declaration on the Right of Peoples to Peace, made peace a human right. This declaration “solemnly” proclaimed “that the peoples of our planet have a sacred right to peace.” But peace has a special place in our faith, because it was so important to Jesus. “Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you.” But ours is not to be a passive role. We are urged to make peace. “Blessed are the peacemakers, they will be called the children of God.” So important a position does peace hold in our faith, that the one time when we actively and individually participate in this service is when we stand, and exchange the peace with our neighbors.

But how often self-styled Christians have missed the point on his. Recall the Crusades of a thousand years ago. Think of all the religious wars fought in pre-modern Europe, settled finally not be any commitment to social tolerance, but by establishing the nation-state system; people on my side of the new international border will have one faith; people on the other can go to hell. And think of the American government’s decision to invade Iraq, driven in no small measure by people of the fundamentalist so-called Christian persuasion.

Our faith also charges with sticking our necks out to improve the society in which we live. In English, we don’t just call our faith Christianity; that word covers many other religions. We are Protestant—an adjective derived from the word protest. That is a notion that got somewhat lost as the religion entered China, where the name is “Christian” 基督教, a term that does not include Catholicism. One can understand why the term “Protestant” was not translated as 抗議教, they would have been run out of the country. Still, in translating “Protestant” as基督教, something important got lost. Some people use the term 基督新教 to distinguish Protestantism from other versions of Christianity, but I’m not enthusiastic about this term either. It’s the other versions of Christianity, with their emphasis on hierarchy and their only guarded embrace of human rights, that sprang up were anew after Christ’s time. Ours lessons are taken from His original teachings, and the example he set.

Jesus’s life was a life of protest. But for 15 centuries the idea of protest was on Christianity’s back burner. Then came a monk named Martin Luther, who in 1517 at the German city of Wittenberg wrote his “95 Theses,” and, according to tradition, nailed them on the front door of the castle church. Protesting was back on the front burner.

Suddenly people remembered the passage from Isaiah that was read earlier (Isaiah 9:6-7, and 10:1-3) about unjust laws, and the message that you heard from Paul’s letter to the Ephesians about the importance of struggle against bad rulers, and evil in general (Ephesians 6:10-20). Even (or perhaps especially) the priesthood became something of a target. (Given the choice of respecting a priest, or a more socially aware but otherwise lesser figure from a marginal ethnic minority, Jesus had unhesitatingly chosen the Good Samaritan.) Also recalled was the story in Luke about how Jesus dealt with the problem of how one should conduct oneself when in a place where people don’t see the issues of good and evil the way we do. Jesus is quoted as saying that the thing to do was make one’s position clear. “Even the dust of your town that clings to our feet, we wipe off in protest against you.” Protesting is not just a right, for Protestants it is an obligation.

So, with all due respect to other faiths, we believe we’ve gotten it right. We find Protestantism to be in complete harmony with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which speaks of “the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family.” Our rights must be exercised “to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom.”

So to summarize all of this: Our Christian faith informs our understanding of human rights, and our concern for human rights rededicates us and gives focus to our Christian faith.

Let us pray. Lord, we thank you for this wonderful church. For the lovely old building, to be sure, but even more for the fellowship and communion that we enjoy here. Empower us, so that, through our diversity and yet unity of purpose, we may serve you, by setting an example for society at large. Give us the wisdom to infuse the principles in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights with the teachings of Jesus Christ. May we, through this union of faith and principles, advance the human condition. Amen.

# posted by Kowloon Union Church : Sunday, November 18, 2007



<< Home

Archives

May 2004|July 2004|September 2004|November 2004|December 2004|April 2005|July 2005|August 2005|September 2005|October 2006|November 2006|December 2006|January 2007|February 2007|March 2007|April 2007|May 2007|July 2007|August 2007|September 2007|October 2007|November 2007|December 2007|January 2008|February 2008|March 2008|April 2008|May 2008|June 2008|July 2008|August 2008|September 2008|October 2008|November 2008|December 2008|January 2009|February 2009|March 2009|April 2009|May 2009|June 2009|July 2009|August 2009|September 2009|October 2009|November 2009|December 2009|January 2010|February 2010|March 2010|April 2010|May 2010|June 2010|July 2010|September 2010|October 2010|November 2010|December 2010|January 2011|February 2011|April 2011|May 2011|June 2011|July 2011|October 2011|November 2011|December 2011|January 2012|February 2012|March 2012|August 2012|September 2012|November 2012|December 2012|January 2013|February 2013|March 2013|April 2013|May 2013|June 2013|September 2013|October 2013|November 2013|December 2013|February 2014|March 2014|April 2014|May 2014|June 2014|July 2014|August 2014|September 2014|October 2014|November 2014|December 2014|January 2015|February 2015|March 2015|April 2015|July 2015|August 2015|October 2015|November 2015|December 2015|January 2016|February 2016|March 2016|April 2016|May 2016|June 2016|July 2016|August 2016|September 2016|October 2016|November 2016|December 2016|January 2017|February 2017|March 2017|April 2017|May 2017|June 2017|July 2017|August 2017|September 2017|October 2017|November 2017|December 2017|January 2018|February 2018|March 2018|April 2018|June 2018|July 2018|August 2018|September 2018|October 2018|November 2018|December 2018|January 2019|February 2019|March 2019|May 2019|June 2019|July 2019|August 2019|September 2019|October 2019|November 2019|December 2019|January 2020|February 2020|March 2020|April 2020|May 2020|June 2020|July 2020|August 2020|September 2020|October 2020|November 2020|December 2020|January 2021|February 2021|March 2021|April 2021|May 2021|June 2021|July 2021|August 2021|September 2021|October 2021|November 2021|December 2021|January 2022|February 2022|March 2022|April 2022|May 2022|June 2022|July 2022|August 2022|September 2022|October 2022|November 2022|December 2022|January 2023|February 2023|March 2023|April 2023|May 2023|June 2023|July 2023|August 2023|September 2023|October 2023|November 2023|December 2023|January 2024|February 2024|March 2024|
Archived sermons by the Barksdales

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?